I’ve got nothing against them, in fact, I got jealous of a few, wishing I was the one that came up with it! Those that have made it to the upper echelons of the profession are already excellent game callers, so why not have one to use. Like I said at the beginning, I don’t begrudge those that have their own phrases. I mean if you’re not a good game caller, what’s the point of even having a catchphrase, right? I think the first point holds more water than the second. He also said if you have a signature home run call, it’s strange sometimes, because a homer in the first inning is different than a meaningful homer late in the game. The meaning behind it, be good at what you were hired to do and worry about the rest of the flare later. I asked why? He said a couple of things to me that I haven’t forgotten.įirst this very talented announcer said something to the effect, it’s more important for you to establish yourself as a great game caller. I thought he would tell me how important it was, but instead he said ‘good’. I remember one well known announcer asking me when I first started with the Padres if I had a catchphrase. It’s not something to me, that’s a mandatory thing. There are many big-league announcers that don’t have one either. One of the best broadcasters in any sport anywhere, really didn’t have a catchphrase. If The Athletic pursued you, suddenly it might not have been embarrassing to ask for a raise.That’s a good spot to pick up. It also gave newspaper writers something they rarely have had over the last couple of decades: leverage. As a standalone site, it offered well-paying, appealing jobs. It should be noted, too, that every writer in the industry should have been rooting for The Athletic. There are plenty of others still standing. The Athletic was - is - a quality product with an engaging approach to sports coverage, and Mather and co-founder Adam Hansmann surely hit the jackpot in the sale of their creation. “We will wait every local paper out and let them continuously bleed until we are the last ones standing,” he said.Īdmittedly, there was some delicious irony in Thursday’s news that The Athletic is being sold to the New York Times - a newspaper! - for $550 million. After all, one of its tech-bro founders, Alex Mather, smugly told the New York Times in 2017 that the site’s goal was essentially to shiv every newspaper sports section around the country. It would be understandable if the sports-reading public assumed that newspaper reporters were rooting for The Athletic to fail. The Athletic was bought by the New York Times for $550 million this week. And they also happen to be football savants who, amusingly, can’t hide their disgust for incompetent quarterback play. Eli comes across as the goofball kid sibling who likes nothing more than to push his more structured older brother’s buttons. Peyton is almost as natural as a host as he was playing quarterback. The “ManningCast” works for a lot of reasons unique to them. If anything, his awkwardness may be amplified, and not in an appealing way like it is with the Mannings. But he struggled to come across as authentic during his time in the main booth - he sometimes seems like an alien perplexed by these ridiculous humans - and it’s tough to fathom how that will change in the new format, especially since the format is much more suited for the pace of an NFL game than a 4-hour-45-minute Red Sox-Yankees slog. The “Kay-Rod” broadcast serves one worthwhile purpose: It gets Rodriguez out of the conventional “Sunday Night” booth after four awkward seasons.ĭespite a long list of transgressions, Rodriguez is one of baseball’s most accomplished players. Per ESPN, the broadcasts will “integrate fantasy baseball, predictive analytics, and special guests tied to the game.” Rodriguez and Kay will be on site for some games, and live from their home studios - like the setup for Peyton and Eli Manning - on others.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |